Skip to main content

Case Study 6


CASE STUDY NO. 6
Dubious Methods Used to Investigate Leaks by Hewlett-Packard Board Members

          On September 5, 2006, Newsweek published a story revealing that Hewlett-Packard (HP) chairman Patricia Dunn authorized an internal investigation of HP board members beginning sometime in 2005. Dunn suspected one or more board members of leaking information about HP’s long-term strategy to the news media. One such article appeared on the technology Web site CNET in January 2006.2 Making such confidential information public could have a significant impact on the competitiveness of the company and impact its share price.
          Three private detectives involved in the investigation allegedly engaged in pretexting —the use of false pretenses—to gain access to the telephone records of HP directors, certain employees, and nine journalists. The detectives allegedly obtained and used the targeted individuals’ Social Security numbers to impersonate those individuals in calls to the phone company, with the goal of obtaining private phone records.
          The California state attorney general filed criminal charges against Dunn, Kevin Hunsaker—senior legal counsel and director of ethics and standards of business conduct—and the three outside investigators.3 Dunn admitted that she oversaw the investigation but said she never had any knowledge that illegal methods were used. All charges were eventually dropped against Dunn. Hunsaker and two of the detectives involved pleaded no contest to fraudulent wire communications, a misdemeanor. The judge agreed to drop the charges if they completed 96 hours of community service. The third detective charged in the case agreed to act as a witness for the prosecution and thus escaped criminal proceedings.4
          Eventually, the state settled a separate civil complaint against the company. HP agreed to pay $14.5 million to cover fines and legal costs, and also agreed to strengthen its corporate governance practices. The settlement did not involve any admission or conclusion of guilt on the part of HP.5
          When the scandal broke, one HP board member, Tom Perkins, resigned to protest the methods Dunn used in the investigation. In the aftermath, Dunn and Hunsaker also resigned from the board. George Keyworth, a 21-year member of the HP board of directors, was identified by Dunn as being the one who leaked the information, and he also resigned.
          Throughout the scandal, investors continued to show faith in HP, and the price of the stock rose steadily from a level of $32 per share in July 2006 to over $43 per share in early January 2007.

 Questions to Answer:
1.    Which issue is more disconcerting—the fact that a board member leaked confidential information about the firm or the tactics used to investigate the leak? Defend your position.
             - For me, the more disconcerting is the fact that a board member official leaks a confidential information about the company that could cause problems to the state of the company. It is disturbing to think that an official, who is responsible for the success of the company, ready to break the law just to get ahead of everyone.
2.    Can the use of pretexting to gain information ever be justified? Is it considered legal under any circumstances?
         - No, It will be against the privacy of the person involved. However, if there is enough evidence to support the actions of the authorities should reconsider this pretense. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Case Study 3

CASE STUDY NO. 3 Antibribery Laws Force U.S. Companies to Raise the Bar on Business Ethics In the mid-1970s, investigations by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) revealed that more than 400 companies in the United States had made illegal or questionable payments to foreign sources. To clean up the United States’ image overseas, Congress enacted the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which allows the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC to prosecute businesses and company personnel who bribe governments, politicians, or political parties abroad. Companies can be fined up to $2 million and be barred from doing business with the U.S. government, receiving an export license, and engaging in the securities business. People can be imprisoned for up to five years and fined twice the amount they hoped to receive as a result of the bribery. So, executives of a large IT company today wouldn’t dare bribe foreign officials, say, to obtain a large government contra...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Study 10 Trading Scandal at Société Générale

Case Study No. 10 Trading Scandal at Société Générale In January 2008, Société Générale (SocGen), France’s second largest banking establishment, was a victim of internal fraud carried out by an employee, Jérôme Kerviel. SocGen bank lost €4.9 billion (euros) as an immediate result of the fraud. (At the time of the incident, the euro was worth approximately $1.45.) In 2007, SocGen was rated the best equity derivatives operation in the world by Risk magazine. Its internal control system of checks and balances was world renowned. For example, its trading room had five levels of hierarchy, each of which had a clear set of trading limits and controls, checked daily by a small army of compliance officers.2 In addition, “the bank also [had] a shock team of internal auditors who descend on a corner of the bank without warning and pull apart its operations to ensure they conform to bank rules.”3 During the summer of 2000, Kerviel began his employment at the bank—ironically, in its Comp...
Post a Comment
Read more